general Archived signal Translated · Español · 2–5m lag

El Tribunal Supremo acuerda dar la «precedencia de la audiencia para la alegación contra Delhi SIR

El abogado Prashant Bhushan dijo que las autoridades electorales no han revelado, aunque las reglas lo exigen, los nombres de las personas a quienes están divulgando avisos.

Reported by The Hindu
Read the complete report at The Hindu
Verification notice

IntelMap indexes open-source reporting. This page identifies what a source reported; it does not independently confirm the claim.

INCIDENT FUSION

2 reports · 2 sources

The HinduEl Tribunal Supremo acuerda dar la «precedencia de la audiencia para la alegación contra Delhi SIRThe HinduEl Tribunal Supremo acuerda dar la «precedencia de la audiencia para la alegación contra Delhi SIR
INCIDENT EVOLUTION

9 recorded states

Signal first indexedP1 · 68% quality · 1 source

Corroboration 1→2 sources · quality 68→72P1 · 72% quality · 2 sources

Quality 72→76P1 · 76% quality · 2 sources

Quality 76→80P1 · 80% quality · 2 sources

Quality 80→84P1 · 84% quality · 2 sources

Quality 84→88P1 · 88% quality · 2 sources

Quality 88→92P1 · 92% quality · 2 sources

Quality 92→96P1 · 96% quality · 2 sources

Quality 96→99P1 · 99% quality · 2 sources

Explore this day in the archive →
QUALITY CONTROL

Report this signal

Reports are anonymous and retained privately for editorial review.