general Archived signal Translated · Español · 2–5m lag

Jacob Ingebritsen estaba en la meta: – Él sacrificó todo

El lugar de la pelota saltó para un Jacob Asserson Ingebrigtsen constante (25) en la final de la Liga del Diamante, mientras que Amalie Iuel (32) fue...

Reported by Aftenposten
Read the complete report at Aftenposten
Verification notice

IntelMap indexes open-source reporting. This page identifies what a source reported; it does not independently confirm the claim.

INCIDENT FUSION

4 reports · 2 sources

AftenpostenJacob Ingebritsen estaba en la meta: – Él sacrificó todoAftenpostenJacob Ingebritsen tomó la delantera en el logro de los objetivos – reaccionando a los competidoresAftenpostenJacob Ingebritsen estaba en la meta: – Él sacrificó todoAftenpostenJacob Ingebritsen tomó la delantera en el logro de los objetivos – reaccionando a los competidores
INCIDENT EVOLUTION

33 recorded states

Signal first indexedP1 · 68% quality · 1 source

Corroboration 1→2 sources · quality 68→72P1 · 72% quality · 2 sources

Quality 72→76P1 · 76% quality · 2 sources

Quality 76→80P1 · 80% quality · 2 sources

Quality 80→84P1 · 84% quality · 2 sources

Quality 84→88P1 · 88% quality · 2 sources

Corroboration 2→1 sourcesP1 · 88% quality · 1 source

Quality 88→68P1 · 68% quality · 1 source

Corroboration 1→2 sources · quality 68→72P1 · 72% quality · 2 sources

Quality 72→76P1 · 76% quality · 2 sources

Quality 76→80P1 · 80% quality · 2 sources

Quality 80→84P1 · 84% quality · 2 sources

Quality 84→88P1 · 88% quality · 2 sources

Corroboration 2→1 sourcesP1 · 88% quality · 1 source

Quality 72→76P1 · 76% quality · 2 sources

Quality 76→80P1 · 80% quality · 2 sources

Quality 80→84P1 · 84% quality · 2 sources

Quality 84→88P1 · 88% quality · 2 sources

Quality 88→68P1 · 68% quality · 1 source

Corroboration 1→2 sources · quality 68→72P1 · 72% quality · 2 sources

Quality 72→76P1 · 76% quality · 2 sources

Corroboration 1→2 sources · quality 68→72P1 · 72% quality · 2 sources

Quality 76→80P1 · 80% quality · 2 sources

Quality 80→84P1 · 84% quality · 2 sources

Quality 84→88P1 · 88% quality · 2 sources

Quality 88→92P1 · 92% quality · 2 sources

Quality 92→96P1 · 96% quality · 2 sources

Quality 96→99P1 · 99% quality · 2 sources

Source details updatedP1 · 99% quality · 2 sources

Source details updatedP1 · 99% quality · 2 sources

Corroboration 2→1 sourcesP1 · 99% quality · 1 source

Quality 72→76P1 · 76% quality · 2 sources

Quality 92→96P1 · 96% quality · 2 sources

Explore this day in the archive →
QUALITY CONTROL

Report this signal

Reports are anonymous and retained privately for editorial review.